Certainly the game is afoot in the UK. There is so much debate happening about the High Speed Rail going from London up to the north.
In order to get more information go to http://www.theguardian.com/uk/hs2 and read some of the recient articles. This is such a huge topic that its hard to overstate the role the project will play in society and political implementation for generations.
While HS2 is no Hyperloop, the costs of the project are beyond belief.
Certainly there could be a better way to make high speed transport cheaper?
The UK is certainly capable of pushing a large transport project to be built. The approach to upgrading rail is nothing new and but this time it has sparked a nerve in the wider society by the very Government that has pushed for austitarity. The polar opposite political ambitions are dividing the society and the parties.
If a political party in Colorado introduced a large scale project to upgrade the existing rail lines from Pueblo all the way north to Cheyenne Wyoming, so passengers could be swiftly transported, what would the reaction be?
Are any political party in Colorado capable of making such a daring proposal? What if two parties worked together? Could a Hyperloop project be supported even with the backing of two parties?
The core of the Colorado Hyperloop is really a test of political will. Do Colorado Citizens have enough political will to push their parties to develop innovative ideas?
One indication might be from the defeat of Amendment 66 http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_24479256/amendment-66-defeat-capped-year-challenges-gov-hickenlooper.
Even the Governor with both House and Senate could not get extra monies from the very citizens who elected them to improve public schools. Would the citizens of Colorado approve of state spending monies on developing the Hyperloop even if only a hundred jobs would be created? We all know the hyperloop construction will be automated, as will its operation. The Hyperloop will not need people for its maintenance nor it will it depend on pensioned staff or expensive staff.
Could the Hyperloop be brought to design and construction and operated completely with democratic support from every group (including NIMBY’s)? This would require a revolution in projects.
I am not sure if there is current models that could make such a project happen.
That is where UK public discourse comes in. Last week a well known British person told a news presenter why he did not vote in elections: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/nov/07/russell-brand-row-nick-clegg-jeremy-paxman
The main reason is that the political parties are not representing the people. Now I am reminded of a quote: “The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.” – Winston Churchill
The Colorado Hyperloop needs to not only be built, but getting the political will will also have to done completely with innovative techniques. Nothing in the Hyperloop project will be like any other transport project.